• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Thomas More Law Center

The Sword and Shield for People of Faith

  • Home
  • Key Issues
    • Defending the Religious Freedom of Christians
    • Restoring Family Values
    • Defending the Sanctity of Human Life
    • Confronting the Threat of Radical Islam
    • Defending National Security
  • News
    • Press Releases
    • TMLC News Alerts
  • About
    • About the Thomas More Law Center
    • President & Chief Counsel
    • History of the Law Center
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Request for Legal Help
  • Donate
    • Become a TMLC Member
    • Other Ways to Give
      • Planned Giving
    • Financial Transparency Information

Uncategorized

Murtha, NCIS Sec., and Several Marine Generals Demanded in Unlawful Command Influence Motion

April 14, 2008 by

imag141-fullANN ARBOR, MI – Military prosecutors are desperately fighting to prevent the testimony of Pennsylvania Congressman John Murtha, Secretary of the Navy Donald Winters and several top Marine Generals, including former Marine Commandant Michael Hagee and the current Commandant James Conway.

The requested witnesses will show the dirty hand of unlawful command influence—considered by the courts as the “mortal enemy of military justice.” The hearing on the motion to produce the testimony of these high ranking officials will begin tomorrow morning at Camp Pendleton, California.

The Unlawful Command Influence motion (click here to read motion) was one of seven motions brought on for hearing this week by the Thomas More Law Center, a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan.  Court decisions on unlawful command influence require the military judge to avoid even the “appearance of this evil” in his courtroom.  The Law Center, along with two detailed Marine lawyers, is defending Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani, the highest ranking military officer charged in the November 19, 2005, Haditha incident.

Law Center attorneys Rob Muise and Brian Rooney, as well as detailed military defense counsel, Lt. Col. John Shelbourne, USMC, and Captain Jeff King, USMC, will present oral arguments on the seven motions to military judge Colonel Stephen Folsom, USMC.

“It was obvious from the outset that Lt. Col. Chessani was being made a political scapegoat.  Even before the investigation was completed, Congressman Murtha publicly accused the Haditha Marines of “cold blooded murder” and officers of covering it up.  Murtha claimed he got his information from the highest level of the military,” said Richard Thompson, Chief Counsel of the Law Center.

The criminal charges against Lt. Col. Chessani stem from a house-to-house, room-by-room battle four of his enlisted Marines engaged in on November 19, 2005, after being ambushed by insurgents in the town of Haditha, Iraq.  Even though Lt. Col. Chessani immediately reported the events of that day to his superiors, including the death of 15 noncombatant civilians caught in the crossfire, nobody in Lt. Col. Chessani’s chain of command, all the way to General Casey showed any interest in conducting an investigation because they understood this to be combat action—not a law of war violation.

However, months later, a Time magazine story instigated by an insurgent propaganda agent, caused Pentagon officials to order the largest investigation in the history of the Naval Criminal Investigative Services (NCIS).  As a result, Lt. Col. Chessani, one of America’s most effective combat commanders in Iraq, now faces dismissal (an officer’s equivalent of a dishonorable discharge), loss of retirement, and imprisonment of up to 3 years.

Thus far, after 30 months of investigation costing millions of dollars, the cases against three of the four enlisted men charged for their part in the Haditha incident have been dismissed.

If defense attorneys are able to produce some evidence of unlawful command influence, the burden will shift to prosecutors to show beyond a reasonable doubt that: (1) the predicate facts alleged by the defense are untrue; (2) the predicate facts alleged do not constitute unlawful command influence; or (3) the unlawful command influence will not affect the proceedings.

This burden is high because command influence deprives service members of their constitutional rights. It is important to note that the court will determine not only whether there was actual unlawful command influence, but also whether there was an appearance of impropriety that would taint the public’s perception of the fairness of the court-martial.

On May 17, 2006, months before the investigation was completed, Congressman Murtha held his first news conference on the Haditha incident.  Murtha said he had been told by the highest levels of the Marine Corps that there was no IED, there was no firefight, and the Marines “killed innocent civilians in cold blood.”

The next day, Murtha again spoke about Haditha and confidentially proclaimed “All the information I get, it comes from the commanders, it comes from people who know what they’re talking about.”  “It’s much worse than reported in Time magazine.”

He told a reporter for the Philadelphia Inquirer that Gen. Michael Hagee had given him the information on which he based his accusations.

Murtha’s claim of cold blooded murder and cover-up fly in the face of previous investigations conducted by Army personnel.

The first investigation conducted by Army Colonel G. A. Watt found “there are no indications that [Coalition Forces] intentionally targeted, engaged, and killed noncombatants.”  A second, by Army Major General Aldon Bargewell concluded there was no “cover-up” by the chain-of-command, and that “[The inaccurate press release that launched Time magazine’s investigation] was not the result of any intent to conceal misconduct . . .” 

When Colonel Watt’s findings were given to Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld on March 10, 2006, one Pentagon official recalled,   “Rumsfeld told aides that the case promised to be a major problem.  He called it ‘really, really bad — as bad or worse than Abu Ghraib.’”

Several sources, including Generals Hagee and Conway, have told defense counsel that Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld decided to set up an oversight “body” to keep tabs on the investigations and prosecutions of the Haditha cases.

The Thomas More Law Center defends and promotes the religious freedom of Christians, time-honored family values, and the sanctity of human life through litigation, education, and related activities.  It does not charge for its services.  The Law Center is supported by contributions from individuals, corporations and foundations, and is recognized by the IRS as a section 501(c)(3) organization.  You may reach the Thomas More Law Center at (734) 827-2001 or visit our website at www.thomasmore.org.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Memories of Fallen Marines Counter ACLU’s Latest Attempt to Tear Down Mt. Soledad Cross

April 10, 2008 by

imag179-fullANN ARBOR, MI – On Monday, April 14, 2008, the Honorable Larry Alan Burns, a federal district court judge in Southern California, will hear oral arguments in the ACLU’s latest lawsuit to tear down the Mt. Soledad Cross.  When Judge Burns considers the case, he will have in his file a compelling brief supporting the Mt. Soledad Cross filed by the Thomas More Law Center.

The Law Center’s friend of the court brief was filed on behalf of the families of Marine Majors Michael D. Martino and Gerald Bloomfield, III, both of whom were killed in combat in Iraq on November 2, 2005 when their attack helicopter was shot down by a surface-to-air missile.  Their memories are now preserved by plaques located under the Mt. Soledad Cross, which were dedicated in their honor by their Marine Squadron.  (Click here to see brief.)

The Thomas More Law Center, a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, filed its brief on behalf of Sybil and Robert Martino—parents of Major Martino—and Julie Bloomfield—spouse of Major Bloomfield.  The brief contains several moving photographs of family members at the grave site at Arlington National Cemetery and at the Mt. Soledad Memorial.

Richard Thompson, the President and Chief Counsel for the Law Center, commented, “Rather than focusing solely on cold legal precedent, we wanted the court to feel the devastating impact removing the cross will have on families who have given up their most precious possession in defense of our country.  Ironically, the ALCU wants to use the very constitution these Marines died protecting to eliminate the memory of their sacrifices.”

In May 2006, Major Martino and Major Bloomfield’s unit, which had recently returned from Iraq, sponsored a plaque dedication ceremony at the memorial to commemorate the fallen Marines’ heroic service and to provide a place to honor them.  Over three hundred Marines stood in line for over three hours to meet the Marines’ families and to pay respect for their fallen comrades.

The Law Center stepped in and defended the Cross just weeks before it was to be taken down pursuant to an agreement between the City of San Diego and a self-proclaimed atheist who was seeking to remove it.  From that point on, the Law Center, with assistance from its West Coast Regional Director, Charles LiMandri, has played a significant role in defending the Cross.  The Law Center ultimately prevailed in both the state and federal courts by successfully petitioning the federal government to transfer the cross from city to federal property, thereby rendering a district court’s order to remove the cross moot.

However, the ACLU soon thereafter filed a new lawsuit, this time against the federal government, claiming the transfer was improper and that the display of the memorial cross as part of this veterans’ memorial violated the so-called “wall of separation of church and state.”  Federal government lawyers are defending the cross in this new lawsuit.  However, the Law Center is supporting their efforts by adding a new perspective to the legal arguments supporting the cross─the importance of the cross to the surviving family members.

imag178-fullRobert Muise, the Thomas More Law Center attorney who authored the brief, is a former Marine Major himself.  Said Muise, “Our brief demonstrates that tearing down the memorial cross will cause real, irreparable harm to these grieving families, as compared with the contrived ‘harm’ the ACLU will ‘feel’ because the memorial cross remains.  Indeed, it is the ACLU in this case who is creating the sort of religiously-based divisiveness that our Constitution was designed to prohibit.”

The Mt. Soledad Cross is the centerpiece of this world class veterans’ memorial.  Over 2,000 plaques honoring individuals or groups of veterans are displayed at the memorial.  Some of the plaques contain Stars of David, honoring Jewish veterans.  There is also a large American flag flying at the base of the memorial.  In a letter to the private association that maintains the memorial, President Bush stated, “Mount Soledad becomes a place to reflect on our past, be inspired by true patriots, and offer war veterans our heartfelt gratitude for the freedom we all enjoy today.” (Click here to read this letter from President Bush.)

The Thomas More Law Center defends and promotes the religious freedom of Christians, time-honored family values, and the sanctity of human life through education, litigation, and related activities.  It does not charge for its services.  The Law Center is supported by contributions from individuals, corporations and foundations, and is recognized by the IRS as a section 501(c)(3) organization.  You may reach the Thomas More Law Center at (734) 827-2001 or visit our website at www.thomasmore.org.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Homosexuals’ Big Blunder: Sally Kern Didn’t Back Down – Thousands Rally to Her Support

April 8, 2008 by

imag172-full ANN ARBOR, MI — National homosexual groups saw an opportunity to make an example of Oklahoma State Legislator Sally Kern when her comments about homosexuality drew national attention.  They targeted her for their special venom in hopes to get her to publicly back down.  Even Ellen DeGeneres, the openly lesbian television host and comedian attempted to get into the fray.  She called Rep. Kern on her television talk show, but Kern’s voicemail was full.

Radical homosexuals flooded her office with over 30,000 vulgar, explicit, hate filled e-mails (click here to view – warning: very explicit language), pressured financial supporters to withdraw their support, and sponsored a demonstration of 300 pro-homosexual activists in front of the State Capitol.  Letters were even sent to Rep. Kern’s colleagues asking that they remove her from office.  Still, she refused to apologize.

Rep. Kern is represented by the Thomas More Law Center, a national Christian public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan.  Rep. Kern did not back down, and Christians counterattacked.  Last Wednesday, fifty area pastors sponsored a “Free Speech Rally for Sally” inside the Rotunda of the OK State Capitol.

Upwards of 3,000 Oklahomans attended the rally chanting “Sally! Sally! Sally!” The crowd became so large that security guards had to turn many away at the entrance doors, and others could not find a place to park.

Rep. Sally Kern was “humbled” by it all.  Her husband, a Baptist minister, introduced her to the thunderous applause of the audience.  As she has throughout the entire ordeal, Rep. Kern’s message to the assembled crowd was one of love for the sinner: “God loves us all.  He loves us equally and He loves us regardless of our sins.”

However, Rep. Kern was emphatic that homosexual conduct is a sin: “Let me tell you why I will not, why I cannot, apologize for my comments.  First, I believe God’s Word.  When God calls something a sin, then it is a sin.  God never changes and neither does His Word.”

Click here to read the full text of Rep. Kern’s speech at the Free Speech Rally.

imag177-fullHomosexual groups first focused their ire on her after her comments to a Republican club meeting appeared as a You Tube audio clip.  On the audio clip, which contains only about 500 words of the her 4000-word speech, one can hear Rep. Kern expressing her concern that the homosexual agenda is destroying our nation, and that young school children are being indoctrinated into believing that the homosexual life style is normal.

Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of the Law Center, commented, “Radical homosexuals, outraged at her refusal to back down, have already recruited a candidate to run against Sally this year, and are renewing their efforts to bombard her with hate-filled e-mails.”

Aside from the numerous local pastors supporting her, Concerned Women for America, American Family Association, and the Eagle Forum – of which Kern is a member – have come to her aid.

The Thomas More Law Center defends and promotes the religious freedom of Christians, time-honored family values, and the sanctity of human life through education, litigation, and related activities.  It does not charge for its services.  The Law Center is supported by contributions from individuals, corporations and foundations, and is recognized by the IRS as a section 501(c)(3) organization.  You may reach the Thomas More Law Center at (734) 827-2001 or visit our website at www.thomasmore.org.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Federal Judge Dismisses ACLU’s Lawsuit Against Baptist Home

April 7, 2008 by

imag80-fullANN ARBOR, MI – Last week, federal judge Charles R. Simpson, III, dismissed an ACLU lawsuit against a Kentucky Baptist Homes for Children (recently renamed Sunrise Children’s Services) following an 8-year legal battle.  The case began when Alicia Pedreira, a seven month employee, sued the Home, which provides social services for at-risk children, after she was terminated for an openly proclaimed lesbian lifestyle.  The reason for the termination was that her lifestyle was contrary to the Home’s Christian mission and values.

Pedreira’s fist lawsuit, filed in 2000, claimed her firing was an act of religious discrimination.  However, the court rejected that claim in 2001, but allowed her and several other taxpayers represented by the ACLU and Americans United for Separation of Church and State to pursue a claim under the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution, namely, the Home was using government funds to promote religion.

This past week, however, relying on the U.S Supreme Court’s  2007 Hein v. Freedom from Religion Foundation decision,  Judge Simpson  dismissed the new claim as well, on the grounds that taxpayers do not have standing to sue over executive branch funding of faith-based agencies.   An attorney for plaintiffs indicated they will appeal Judge Simpson’s ruling.

Attorneys with the Thomas More Law Center, a national public interest law center based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, began providing legal assistance to Baptist Home’s principle attorney John Sheller, soon after the ACLU’s lawsuit was filed in 2000.

Pat Gillen, one of the Thomas More Law Center attorneys who worked on the case, observed,  “Sunrise Children’s Services has the same right to receive reimbursement to provide help to the children of Kentucky as any other social services provider.” Gillen currently serves as a visiting professor at Ave Maria School of Law.

In his decision dismissing the case, Judge Simpson found that Kentucky legislators merely made appropriations for government funding, but executive agencies that oversee social services for children and families actually made the decision to devote partial funding to the home.

The Thomas More Law Center defends and promotes the religious freedom of Christians, time-honored family values, and the sanctity of human life through education, litigation, and related activities.  It does not charge for its services.  The Law Center is supported by contributions from individuals, corporations and foundations, and is recognized by the IRS as a section 501(c)(3) organization.  You may reach the Thomas More Law Center at (734) 827-2001 or visit our website at www.thomasmore.org.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

150,000 Additional Signatures Needed to Defend Marriage in California!

April 4, 2008 by

imag175-full To permanently protect traditional marriage between one man and one woman, now being threatened in the courts and legislature, volunteer coalitions have come together to pass an amendment to the California Constitution. 

If passed, the Protect Marriage Amendment would add new language to the California state constitution:

“Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.”

To place this Constitutional Amendment on the ballot, the coalition needs to turn in 1.1 million signatures by Tuesday, April 8th.  So far, the coalition has received 951,000 signatures – but time is running out!  We have only until Tuesday, April 8th, to gather over 150,000 more!  You can help!

How can you help?

First, please know that only California registered voters can sign the petition to place the Marriage Protection Amendment on November’s ballots.  If you are not a CA resident, please forward this message to family and friends in the state of California to make sure that they have done their part to defend marriage! 

Second, to California residents:

1.  Request your petition today! Official petitions are now available.  Click on the REQUEST PETITION button on the ProtectMarriage.com home page and order petitions today!

2.  After you sign the petition, help collect more signatures from friends and colleagues who also support marriage.  To circulate the petition, you must be registered to vote or eligible to register to vote.  Only registered voters, however, may sign the petition.  Sign up as a volunteer circulator!

3.  Endorse the ProtectMarriage Amendment!  Fill out the form on this website and become part of the team.

What You Should Know…

imag176-full• Right now, activist homosexual organizations are pulling out all the stops to block this voter initiative in this crucial time – they have flown in teams from across the nation to work against the pro-marriage coalitions, formed phone banks to contact CA voters and attempt to dissuade them from protecting marriage, and are engaged in store-to-store campaigns to defeat the amendment.

• This amendment must be passed now in order to protect marriage for future generations.  18 other states have already amended their constitutions to defend marriage – but California is a major force in determining the future of America, and the battle for CA families must be won NOW.

• An amendment to the California Constitution, which requires a vote of the people, is the only way to stop the politicians, and especially the courts, from re-defining marriage against the will of the majority of Californians.

• Just 8 years ago in the March 2000 election, California voters overwhelmingly passed Proposition 22 by over 61% of the vote.  Prop. 22 added a regular statute to the California Family Code to keep marriage between a man and a woman and prevent the state Legislature from redefining marriage without a vote of the people. Since then however, politicians and judges have chipped away at Prop 22 and ignored the will of the voters. For example:

• Two years ago, San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom thumbed his nose at California voters by issuing marriage licenses to thousands of homosexual couples in open defiance of Proposition 22. Ultimately, the courts declared those so-called “marriages” to be invalid, but left the door open to a future constitutional challenge against traditional marriage.

• Additionally, the courts have undermined Proposition 22 and marriage by upholding an act of the Legislature that gave homosexual “domestic partners” the full legal status of married spouses. A San Francisco judge ruled that Proposition 22, a regular statute, violates the California Constitution and ordered the licensing of same-sex “marriages.” That decision is currently being appealed in the California Supreme Court.

• The Legislature is now considering legislation (Assembly Bill 43) to allow licensing of homosexual “marriage.”

• Read more here…

Act NOW to protect marriage and family in CA!

  • Sign the petition to get this amendment on the ballot!

  • Forward this message to family and friends in CA!

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Courageous Christian Legislator Doesn’t Back Down – Free Speech Rally for Sally

April 1, 2008 by

imag172-fullANN ARBOR, MI — Representative Sally Kern, a devout Christian and Oklahoma legislator, has been targeted by some of the nation’s largest and most radical homosexual groups, she has received over 27,000 vulgar, hate filled e-mails, she has been verbally ambushed by homosexual radicals at public meetings, but she hasn’t backed down.

Now, other Christians will join over 50 pastors at the State Capitol in Okalahoma City tomorrow to rally in her support.

Event Details:

What: Free Speech Rally for Oklahoma State Representative Sally Kern

When: Wednesday, April 2nd at 12:00 pm Noon

Where: Rotunda of the Oklahoma State Building, 2300 N. Lincoln Blvd., Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

Rep. Kern is represented by the Thomas More Law Center, a national Christian public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan.  She came under fire from radical homosexual groups on account of statements made at a Republican club meeting.  Rep. Kern expressed her concern that the homosexual agenda was destroying our nation, and that young school children were being indoctrinated into believing that the homosexual life style is normal.  Her comments were taped and appeared as a You Tube audio clip.

Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of the Law Center, commented, “Radical homosexual groups have done all they could to intimidate her, yet she has not backed down.  She is truly a courageous Christian woman.  And it’s gratifying to see other Christian groups come to her aid.”

Aside from the numerous local pastors supporting her, Concerned Women for America, American Family Association, and the Eagle Forum – of which Rep Kern is a member – have come to her aid.

A number of the hate-filled emails sent to Rep. Kern are posted on the TMLC website so that supporters can witness the words of the radical homosexual agenda.  ***Warning: the emails contain very graphic language.***

The Thomas More Law Center defends and promotes the religious freedom of Christians, time-honored family values, and the sanctity of human life through education, litigation, and related activities.  It does not charge for its services.  The Law Center is supported by contributions from individuals, corporations and foundations, and is recognized by the IRS as a section 501(c)(3) organization.  You may reach the Thomas More Law Center at (734) 827-2001 or visit our website at www.thomasmore.org.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 72
  • Page 73
  • Page 74
  • Page 75
  • Page 76
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 101
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

  • The President’s Blog
  • TMLC in the News
  • Request for Legal Help
  • Leave a Legacy
  • Sign up as Pro Bono Attorney

Get Email Updates

STAY CONNECTED
  • Become a Fan
  • Follow Us
  • Video Library
  • RSS Feed

  • Home
  • Key Issues
  • News
  • About
  • Contact
  • Donate
© 2024 - Thomas More Law Center • 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive • Suite J 3200 • Ann Arbor, MI 48106 • Office: 734.827.2001 • Fax: 734.930.7160