• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Thomas More Law Center

The Sword and Shield for People of Faith

  • Home
  • Key Issues
    • Defending the Religious Freedom of Christians
    • Restoring Family Values
    • Defending the Sanctity of Human Life
    • Confronting the Threat of Radical Islam
    • Defending National Security
  • News
    • Press Releases
    • TMLC News Alerts
  • About
    • About the Thomas More Law Center
    • President & Chief Counsel
    • History of the Law Center
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Request for Legal Help
  • Donate
    • Become a TMLC Member
    • Other Ways to Give
      • Planned Giving
    • Financial Transparency Information

Uncategorized

TMLC Files Appeal in Dismissal of Lawsuit Challenging the “Hate Crimes” Act

December 9, 2010 by

December 9, 2010

ANN ARBOR, MI – The Thomas More Law Center (TMLC), a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, filed its opening brief earlier this week with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, seeking to overturn a lower court decision dismissing its federal lawsuit challenging the Federal Hate Crimes Act passed in 2009.

TMLC’s lawsuit was the first in the Nation to challenge the federal law. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Pastors Rene Ouellette, James Combs, Levon Yuille and the president of the American Family Association of Michigan, Gary Glenn, against U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder.

Earlier this year, a U.S. District Court Judge dismissed the case on the grounds that the plaintiffs lacked “standing” to bring the lawsuit, and that the case was not “ripe” for adjudication.  TMLC is appealing this ruling.

The Hate Crimes Act was clearly intended to intimidate Christians and their religious leaders into remaining silent concerning their religious belief that homosexual conduct is an abomination and a sin.

According to the brief filed by TMLC with the Sixth Circuit, “This statute is all about elevating certain persons (homosexuals) to a protected class under federal law based on nothing more than their choice to have sex with persons of the same gender, while marginalizing strong religious opposition to this immoral choice.”

Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of TMLC, commented: “Under the guise of enforcing ‘niceness’ and promoting ‘tolerance,’ homosexual advocacy groups have mobilized their financial power to purchase political clout which they now use to shut down any criticism of their deviant lifestyle.  The truth is they are one of the most intolerant groups in our society and viciously attack anyone who opposes their point of view.”

Continued Thompson: “The sole purpose of this law is to use the threat of federal prosecutions and long jail sentences to silence Christians from expressing their Biblically-based religious belief that homosexual conduct is an abomination and a sin.”

According to statistics compiled by their own “gay rights” advocacy groups, the greatest threat of violence to homosexuals comes not from Christians, but from other homosexuals.  Christians are taught to love the sinner, but to hate the sin.

Evidence clearly shows the Act will be used by federal prosecutors to intimidate Christians and shut down any speech critical of the homosexual life style.  For example, the ACLU of Michigan hosted a forum on the Hate Crime Act for the LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgendered) community that was attended by Barbara McQuade, the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan, and her assistants responsible for enforcing the Act.

McQuade told her audience, “We’re very eager to enforce the Act.”

Pam Thompson, another federal prosecutor said, “We are so excited about this new law and the enforcement opportunities it provides for us.”

A third federal prosecutor, Judith Levy, said, “Our office is open for business in enforcing and defending the Hate Crimes Prevention Act.”  She encouraged the LGBT community to show up at court hearings for the Hate Crimes lawsuit.

Robert Muise, Senior Trial Counsel for TMLC who is handling the case, observed, “This new federal law promotes two Orwellian concepts. First, it creates a special class of persons who are ‘more equal than others’ based on nothing more than deviant, sexual behavior. And secondly, it creates ‘thought crimes’ by criminalizing certain ideas, beliefs, and opinions, and the involvement of such ideas, beliefs, and opinions in a crime will make it deserving of federal prosecution. Consequently, government officials are claiming the power to decide which thoughts are criminal under federal law and which are not.”

No legitimate law enforcement need is served by this Hate Crimes Act.

·         All 50 states already have criminal laws punishing violence against all persons.

·         Attorney General Holder told a Senate hearing that there was no evidence that “hate crimes” were going unpunished at the state level and that the states were doing a fine job in this area.

·         In 2008, the FBI reported approximately 1.38 million violent crimes in the United States, out of which 243 crimes were considered “bias” motivated because of the victim’s sexual orientation.  That amounts to a fraction of 1% of the crimes.

·         According to the statistics compiled by a homosexual advocacy group, during the period from 1999 to 2003, a homosexual was 244% more likely to commit an act of violence against another homosexual than was a heterosexual.

Click here to read the entire brief filed with the Sixth Circuit

The Thomas More Law Center defends and promotes America’s Christian heritage and moral values, including the religious freedom of Christians, time-honored family values, and the sanctity of human life.  It supports a strong national defense and an independent and sovereign United States of America.  The Law Center accomplishes its mission through litigation, education, and related activities.  It does not charge for its services.  The Law Center is supported by contributions from individuals, corporations and foundations, and is recognized by the IRS as a section 501(c)(3) organization.  You may reach the Thomas More Law Center at (734) 827-2001 or visit our website at www.thomasmore.org.

Obama Agenda More Important than Combat Effectiveness

December 3, 2010 by

imag397One message was loud and clear from yesterday’s Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on repeal of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT) law: Secretary of Defense Gates and Joint Chiefs Chairman Admiral Mullen care very little about what our combat troops think about the repeal of the law or its immediate harm to our national defense.

The actual survey numbers of the Pentagon study show that allowing gays to openly serve in the military would be a national security disaster. According to the survey and study, titled “Report of the Comprehensive Review of the Issues Associated with a Repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (Report):

  • Nearly 60% of those in the Marine and Army combat units thought repealing the DADT law would harm their unit’s ability to fight on the battlefield.
  • Up to a half-million service members may not reenlist should the ban be repealed (A disaster for our all–volunteer army that would require re-institution of the Draft).
  • 91% would reject homosexual leaders.
  • 71% would not share showers with homosexuals.

Senator John McCain spoke out on behalf of our combat service members.  He continued his strong opposition to repeal of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law, and questioned Gates and Mullen on why they were not paying more attention to the negative impact a repeal of DADT would have on our combat troops.

Three Reasons Not to Repeal DADT

Senior Military Leaders are Opposed to Repeal

imag472Earlier in the year, both the Commandant of the Marine Corps General James T. Conway and the incoming Commandant, General James Amos, informed the Senate Armed Services Committee that their best military advice was to keep the ban in place.  Army Chief of Staff, General George W. Casey, told the Senate Committee that he had serious concerns about the impact of the repeal on a force engaged in two wars.

It is important to note that Gates and Mullen have muzzled other combat commanders from publicly expressing their opinion opposing repeal of the ban. Both Gates and Mullen publicly reprimanded three-star General Benjamin Mixon, Commander of the U.S. Army Pacific, for publicly expressing his objection to repeal.

To overcome these constraints on active duty senior officers to honestly express their opinion, 1,167 retired flag and general officers, 51 of them former four stars, signed an open letter to President Obama and Congress expressing great concern about the impact that a repeal would have on morale, discipline, unit cohesion and overall military readiness.

Health Risks are Perilous

AIDS would increase in the military once homosexuals were openly admitted into the military and restraints on their sexual behavior are removed.  Heterosexual service members would be more likely to contract AIDS through injuries and battlefield transfusions. Drug abuse and suicides would increase as well, resulting in a dramatic increase in medical care costs. Ironically, the repeal would come at a time when Secretary Gates is seeking to cut and contain health costs in military.

A Radical anti-Christian Policy

imag413To go along with repeal of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law, the Department of Defense recommended elimination of longstanding military laws prohibiting consensual sodomy and adultery.

An overwhelming majority of America’s Armed Forces are Christian.  Yet the Report brushed aside the religious and moral objections to homosexuality by service members.  Admitting that a large number of military chaplains believe that homosexuality is a sin and an abomination, and are required by God to condemn it as such, the Report argues that their objections can be overcome by education and training (brainwashing?).

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Courageous Christian Student Confronts Teacher’s Promotion of the National Homosexual Agenda

December 2, 2010 by

imag483Daniel Glowacki, a 16-year-old junior at Howell High School in Howell, Michigan, has unexpectedly found himself at the center of a national firestorm and the target of homosexual activists across the country, including national lesbian TV host, Ellen DeGeneres.  It came about when he defended another student’s free speech rights, and when confronted by his pro-homosexual teacher, Daniel ended up defending his Catholic faith that considers homosexual conduct a sin.

The incident occurred on October 20, 2010, the day that Daniel’s economics class teacher, Jay McDowell, wore a purple “Tyler’s Army” t-shirt as part of a national campaign to highlight the alleged “bullying” of homosexuals. McDowell was taking part in a national Anti-Bullying Day promoted by the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation. To further promote this national pro-homosexual agenda, McDowell was planning to show the class a video concerning such “bullying.”

Ironically, McDowell ended up “bullying” his own student who dared to defend his Christian beliefs about homosexuality.

When McDowell ordered a student in his classroom to remove her confederate flag belt buckle because he was offended by it, Daniel pointed out the teacher’s obvious hypocrisy: the teacher can promote a message and an agenda that might be offensive to students, but students can’t wear clothing that expresses a message that is offensive to the teacher.

When asked by McDowell whether he supports his activist agenda, Daniel responded that as a Catholic he does not. The outraged teacher angrily threw Daniel out of his classroom and gave him a written referral for his answer.

According to news reports, written statements by students in McDowell’s class indicated that McDowell told them, “If the student [Daniel] was Catholic, he’d be or should be in Catholic school” and followed him into the hall yelling he was a racist.

imag19Predictably, homosexual activists across the country are hailing McDowell as a hero and vilifying Daniel and his family, describing them as “bigots” and referring to Daniel’s religious objection to the homosexual agenda as “hate speech”. McDowell is head of the school district’s teachers union; unsurprisingly, the Michigan Education Association, the state teachers union, has come to McDowell’s defense.

Dozens of students and teachers packed a school board meeting to protest the two-day suspension of McDowell. One student, a 14-year old openly gay student who supported McDowell at the Board meeting, appeared on The Ellen DeGeneres Show to discuss his speech. Subsequently, a digital media company rewarded the student with a $10,000 academic scholarship.

As a result of this public pillorying for standing up for his religious beliefs, Daniel and his parents have retained the legal services of the Thomas More Law Center (TMLC), a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan.  TMLC is representing the family at no charge.

Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of TMLC, commented: “Rather than teach the required economics curriculum which he is paid to do, McDowell used his position of authority to promote his homosexual agenda at taxpayers’ expense. There is no question that he violated Daniel’s constitutional right to freedom of speech.  But this case illustrates much more.  It shows the pernicious way in which homosexual activists have turned our public schools into indoctrination centers, and are seeking to eradicate all religious and moral opposition to their agenda.”

Continued Thompson: “It’s time that parents stand up to the slick gimmicks used by homosexual advocacy groups to promote a dangerous and immoral lifestyle to our children under the guise of tolerance. School districts should fire any teacher who uses class time to advance such a deadly lifestyle.”

Today, TMLC’s Senior Trial Counsel, Robert Muise, sent a Michigan Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the School District, requesting various district policies as well as other documents related to the October 20th incident.  [Read a copy of the FOIA request here]

Filed Under: Uncategorized

X-Ray Nation: TSA Glass Box Mother Over Stored Breast Milk

December 1, 2010 by

By Stacey Armato
Orginally published in Men with Foil Hats, December 1, 2010

I am the brunette in black getting my items ready for screening (you will see me about 45 seconds into the video). I travel every week and bring home breast milk with me through Phoenix Sky Harbor.

TSA rules allow for alternate screening (no x-ray) for breast milk and I almost never had a problem…until the week before this screening. I was held for 30 minutes that week while the TSA manager called to find out the rules. I was told to “pump and dump,” and asked why the milk wasn’t clear, also asked where my baby was and if it was really milk (uh traveling, working mom pumping doesn’t usually have the baby with her).

After begging him to figure it out, they finally let me through. I called and complained to TSA and was instructed to travel with the TSA breast milk rules printed out and present them whenever there is a problem.

As my items come through security this time, I notice immediately that I was dealing with the same people from the week before. The woman tells me right away that my milk might have to go through the x-ray, and then I tell her I printed the rules. I go to grab the rules on top of my bag and she freaks out and pushes my arm away. Another guy comes over and calls for “back up” and they put in me back in the glass cage. Standing 50 ft away are the same manager and supervisor I had dealt with the previous week.

They will stall for 20 minutes before coming over to me.

Meanwhile, one of the guys comes over to me and tells me “to be quiet if I know what’s good for me.” At the end of this portion I have been locked up for just under 10 minutes. The whole ordeal takes just under 1 hour.

My brother in law did me a favor by helping me put the videos together, speed them up, and narrate. He didn’t know all the details so there were a few errors but he tried to get it up as soon as possible knowing that the issue really needed to get out there. My son was 7 months old at the time and I was not pregnant during the video. I got pregnant 6 weeks later and am due any week now with our next little one. Travel and pumping will start again for me in February 2011…

In this segment, I have already been in the glass cage for about 8 minutes.

My patience wears thin and I start crying. It is hard to see on this video, but real tears wouldn’t stop streaming down my face. About 10 minutes into all this, a Phoenix PD comes to calm me down. I explain to him that there is no reason I should be treated this way and I have every right to be upset.

He then says “they” (aka TSA) saw me coming, have it out for me (from my complaint against TSA the week before when they didn’t know the breast milk rules then either), and I should travel out of a different gate in future weeks.

He said TSA wants me to play along with their horse and pony show and if I don’t then TSA can have the Phoenix PD arrest me! Well, I wanted to get home to my baby and my flight was 30 minutes from departure so I ‘played along.’ Three Phoenix PD watched in the background…I could tell they all knew this was a waste of their time but I was happy to have them standing by in case TSA continued to act out of line.

One police officer actually came up to me later during my second screening asking if I was okay and if he could let anyone in my party know I was going to be late. A class act compared to the TSA actions.

During this portion of the screening, my items were looked through by some TSA agents, I was patted down, and then I had a talk with the TSA manager. He told me I had to have the milk go through the x-ray since the containers were too full (not a TSA rule) and the liquid was not clear (hello, it is milk?, and also not a TSA rule).

I then begged him to read the TSA rules I had printed out. He read the first form which stated that medical liquids can have alternate screening (no x-ray). He was quick to say “well this isn’t a medical liquid!” So I had him read the second form which says breast milk is to be treated like a medical liquid. He then says, “well, not today.” I started balling all over again once he said that.

In this segment, the TSA manager tells me I can leave security, redistribute the milk into half full containers (his completely made-up rule) and go through security all over again if I want to avoid x-rays on the milk.

With tears continuing to stream down my face, I did that.

I also missed my flight playing along with his ridiculous game. Curiously, my second screening video (another 20 minutes) has been erased.

During that portion, I was scolded for not watching the woman test my milk (I would turn my head away to hide the tears), the manager wrote down my personal information on a scratch piece of paper and tucked it in his pocket (who knows where that ended up- TSA could only say their “policy” was to destroy information like that…we all know how “policy” went that day, though), and took pictures of my breast milk for some unknown reason.

Southwest put me on the next flight home and, as luck would have it, I was standing in line right behind my Constitutional Law professor from my law school days. At that point I knew I needed to stand up for my rights and help myself and other mothers against the uninformed, retaliatory, and harassing TSA employees that help “keep us safe.”

Editors Note: If you haven’t clicked on the link “TSA rules” above, please do so,  as it very detailed. What we found most interesting was the flashing banner which states ” Myth Buster:  Myth vs Fact on TSA Work Force. Poll: Most OK with TSA full-body scanners. (USAToday)” If  USAToday says it than it must be so…although keep in mind that propaganda is the tool for tyranny.

Oh Yeah…. and Thanks for Flying South West Airlines!

Video Courtesy of  Stacey Armato

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Give Thanks to God for this Great Nation

November 23, 2010 by

“Whereas it is the duty of all Nations to acknowledge the providence of almighty God, to obey his will, to be grateful for his benefits, and humbly to implore his protection and favor…”

President George Washington
Thanksgiving Day Proclamation, October 3, 1789

People - George Washington - PrayingOn October 3, 1789, President George Washington issued the first Thanksgiving Proclamation in United States history. (Click here for entire Proclamation).  Thus began a national holiday that has been celebrated during times of war and peace, in times of plenty and in times of hardship. America has never stopped giving thanks to Almighty God for her abundant blessings.

Thanksgiving is a time to remember that the Source of all our amazing liberties is God.

In recent years, U.S. Supreme Court decisions have interpreted that the Establishment Clause in the Bill of Rights requires a separation of church and state; consequently, many public acknowledgments of God have been declared unconstitutional. This is an erroneous interpretation of the Founding Fathers’ intent: on the same day they reached final agreement on the Bill of Rights, the Founding Fathers asked President Washington to proclaim “a day of public thanksgiving and prayer, to be observed by acknowledging, with grateful hearts, the many signal favors of Almighty God.”

People - Marines - PrayingSo on this Thanksgiving Day, as you gather with family and friends, please thank God for this great Nation and for our amazing liberties; ask that He forgive our national sins and continue to bless America.  Pray for the safe return of our men and women placed in harm’s way in distant lands defending the liberties we enjoy here at home.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Christian Mother Sentenced to Hanging for Blasphemy against Islam

November 19, 2010 by

imag473What is the difference between the village of Itan Wali, Pakistan and the City of Dearborn, Michigan? If you criticize Islam in Itan Wali, you’ll be hung to death; if you criticize Islam in Dearborn, you’ll simply be thrown in jail and prosecuted for Breach of the Peace.

A Pakistani court issued a death sentence this month for Asia Noreen, a 45-year old Christian woman and mother of five from the tiny village in the Punjab province. The charge: blasphemy. According to local authorities, Asia was picking fruit in a field when she dipped her cup into a bucket of drinking water during a break. Her co-workers complained that a non-Muslim had contaminated the water, and the women got into an argument. Witnesses claimed that during the argument Noreen had insulted the prophet Muhammad and the Koran.

The town cleric, Qari Muhammad Salim, went to the police and had Noreen placed under arrest, thrown into prison for 15 months, and finally sentenced to death by hanging. The cleric said Noreen’s death sentence was one of the happiest moments of his life. “Tears of joy poured from my eyes,” Qari Salim told CNN.

imag475Because of worldwide protests and a personal plea from Pope Benedict XVI to release this Christian mother, there is a good chance that the Pakistani government will spare her life.

In Dearborn, Michigan, where one-third of the population is Muslim, police arrested four Christian missionaries on a public street simply because they were discussing their Christian faith with young Muslims during the annual Arab Festival this past summer.  The missionaries were thrown in jail and charged with Breach of the Peace, even though video of the incident clearly showed the entire discussion was peaceful.

Thomas More Law Center attorney Rob Muise was able to step in; and after a weeklong trial, a jury found all four not guilty of the principal charge.  However, Negeen Mayel, an 18-year-old Muslim convert to Christianity, was found guilty of failing to obey a police officer’s orders because the officer said she did not turn off her video camera quickly enough.  Her case is on appeal. The Thomas More Law Center has spent over $100,000 in attorney time and costs on this case (the Law Center represented the missionaries without charge).

Richard Thompson, President & Chief Counsel of the Law Center, commented: “In Dearborn, Sharia law has replaced our Constitution when it comes to free speech.  We’re going to do everything we can to make sure what Dearborn did to these four Christians does not happen again.”

Filed Under: Uncategorized

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 42
  • Page 43
  • Page 44
  • Page 45
  • Page 46
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 101
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

  • The President’s Blog
  • TMLC in the News
  • Request for Legal Help
  • Leave a Legacy
  • Sign up as Pro Bono Attorney

Get Email Updates

STAY CONNECTED
  • Become a Fan
  • Follow Us
  • Video Library
  • RSS Feed

  • Home
  • Key Issues
  • News
  • About
  • Contact
  • Donate
© 2024 - Thomas More Law Center • 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive • Suite J 3200 • Ann Arbor, MI 48106 • Office: 734.827.2001 • Fax: 734.930.7160