• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Thomas More Law Center

The Sword and Shield for People of Faith

  • Home
  • Key Issues
    • Defending the Religious Freedom of Christians
    • Restoring Family Values
    • Defending the Sanctity of Human Life
    • Confronting the Threat of Radical Islam
    • Defending National Security
  • News
    • Press Releases
    • TMLC News Alerts
  • About
    • About the Thomas More Law Center
    • President & Chief Counsel
    • History of the Law Center
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Request for Legal Help
  • Donate
    • Become a TMLC Member
    • Other Ways to Give
      • Planned Giving
    • Financial Transparency Information

Uncategorized

In Honor of Our Veterans

November 11, 2010 by

imag198From Lexington and Valley Forge to Normandy, Korea, and Vietnam—and now to Iraq and Afghanistan—America’s military forces have bravely fought for Freedom and in defense of our Nation.  Veteran’s Day is a time to remember our fighting men and women who made the ultimate sacrifice for our nation with their very lives.

Let us not only take the time to remember the heroic sacrifices of our military throughout our nation’s history, but also to remember the heroic sacrifices our combat men and women are making in Iraq and Afghanistan today.

imag344imag345Let us take this time to pray for our troops who have died in battle, and for their loved ones who still mourn their great loss.  Let us also pray for our troops who are in harm’s way today.

Below is a poem by Marine chaplain Father Dennis Edward O’Brien, which eloquently speaks to both the courage and the irony in the role our soldiers play in protecting our great nation:

It is the Soldier

It is the Soldier, not the reporter
Who has given us freedom of the press.

It is the Soldier, not the poet,
Who has given us freedom of speech.

It is the Soldier, not the campus organizer,
Who has given us the freedom to demonstrate.

It is the Soldier, not the lawyer,
Who has given us the right to a fair trial.

It is the Soldier, who salutes the flag,
Who serves beneath the flag,
And whose coffin is draped by the flag,
Who allows the protestor to burn the flag.

Watch a Powerful  Video of  American Veterans who have fought for OUR freedom

Filed Under: Uncategorized

U.S. Marine Corps Commandant Splits with President – Opposes Homosexuals in the Military

November 8, 2010 by

imag472In open defiance of President Obama, the Secretary of Defense, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the U.S. Marine Corps’ new commandant told reporters in California on Saturday that open homosexuality in the military could be disastrous to our combat effectiveness.  “There is nothing more intimate than young men and young women — and when you talk of infantry, we’re talking our young men — laying out, sleeping alongside of one another and sharing death, fear and loss of brothers,” Lt. General James Amos said. “I don’t know what the effect of that will be on cohesion. I mean, that’s what we’re looking at. It’s unit cohesion, it’s combat effectiveness.”

The controversy over the Obama’s efforts to repeal the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law has created a public split between senior military leaders and President Obama’s political appointees.  Both Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mike Mullen, told Congress earlier in the year that they personally believe the law should be repealed. Furthermore, Admiral Mullen said he was “surprised” at General Amos’ recent comments, and thought that such views should be discussed “privately.”

Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of the Thomas More Law Center, commented: “President Obama’s motivation to repeal the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law has nothing to do with a desire to enhance the combat effectiveness of our Armed Forces. It has everything to do with his desire to fulfill campaign promises and curry favor with homosexual advocacy groups—regardless of its harm to our national security.”

In  February 2010,  Army Chief of Staff, General George W. Casey Jr. told the Senate Committee on Armed Services, “I do have serious concerns about the impact of the repeal of the law on a force that is fully engaged in two wars and has been at war for 8 ½ years. We just don’t know the impacts on readiness and military effectiveness.”

On February 25, 2010, Marine General James T. Conway, the out-going Commandant of the Marine Corps, told the Senate Committee on Armed Services that the “the current policy works.”

“My best military advice to this committee, to the secretary, to the president would be to keep the law such as it is,” Gen. Conway said.

In a subsequent interview with Fox News, General Conway indicated that as many as 95 percent of Marines would be uncomfortable serving alongside openly gay troops.  He indicated that a majority of his men and women think a repeal of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy barring gays would be problematic.

President Barack Obama has repeatedly promised homosexual activists—counted among his most ardent supporters—that he intends to overturn “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” during the lame-duck session, thus effectively dismantling the finest fighting force in human history.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

How Much Time Does the U.S. Have?

October 29, 2010 by

by Charles LiMandri
West Coast Regional Director
Thomas More Law Center

imag469In June, 2008 this writer warned readers that the moral decay eroding the foundation of our nation was bringing it within one generation of collapse.  I have tracked the decline of the U.S. over the past several decades to various landmark judicial decisions that sought to uncouple our nation from its Judeo-Christian moorings.  That decline stands to be greatly escalated by three new judicial decisions over the last three months which I have dubbed the “trilogy of tyranny”.

The first such decision, in July, 2010, by a federal court judge in Massachusetts, overruled the federal Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”).  The second decision, in August 2010, by a federal judge in San Francisco, overruled Proposition 8 in California.  The third decision, in September 2010, by another California federal judge, overruled the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy, concerning the service of open homosexuals in the armed forces.  Individually and collectively, they represent a further direct attack not only on our nation’s morality, but also on our notion of the need for a separation of powers between our three branches of the government.

Thomas Jefferson warned about federal judges becoming a powerful “oligarchy” that would seek to inflict their will over an unwilling populace.  Most of us realize that public policy should be set by the people and their representatives in the state and federal legislatures, and not by unelected federal judges with lifetime appointments who answer to no one. The judiciary was intended by our enlightened founders to be the weakest branch of our government.  Yet, it is increasingly usurping the power of the executive and the legislature and is becoming the strongest branch by sheer force of its own unbridled will.

In seeking to impose a new order of sexual immorality on the nation, these self-appointed ministers of modern secularism have taken a sledge hammer to our traditional notions of “religion and morality”–or what George Washington once called “these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens.”  Washington’s view was soundly rejected by Judge Walker Vaughn who authored the opinion striking down Prop. 8.  In his view, “private morals or religious beliefs” can not serve as the basis for our laws — at least not in the absence of what he would consider a legitimate “secular purpose”— such as trying to make homosexuals feel good about their conduct or “relationships”.

According to Judge Walker and his followers, apparently Washington would simply be considered an irrational bigot — just like the seven million Californians that voted for Prop. 8 — and  the people of 30 other states that also voted to preserve traditional marriage in their state constitutions.  After all, the men who drafted the U.S. Constitution considered sodomy a serious crime and it was never tolerated in either the original thirteen colonies or in Washington’s Continental Army.

I have to ask, consistent with my  premise in  Part I of this article from a year ago, are there really any consequences to deviating from the precepts of religion and morality — particularly as they concern traditional marriage?  In answering that question, rather than wasting any more time with these activist result oriented judges, who pander to a politically powerful and vocal minority, I will look instead for our answers to the writings of yet another great U.S. President.
In that regard, it was none other than our beloved Abraham Lincoln that had this to say on the subject of the importance of religion in the life of our nation:  “It is the duty of nations as well as of men to own their dependence upon the overruling power of God…to recognize the sublime truth announced in the Holy Scriptures, and proven by all history, that those nations are blessed whose God is the Lord.  We know that by His divine law, nations, like individuals, are subjected to punishments and chastisements in this world.”  So if these timeless truths were so obvious to great men like Washington and Lincoln, why do these contemporary federal judges and their leftist leaning cronies find them so difficult to understand?

I am reminded by the fate of the Pharaoh in the Old Testament who would not heed the warnings of Moses to let God’s people leave Egypt.  Pharaoh’s heart became so hardened that he was blinded to the severe consequences of his actions even when his kingdom was afflicted with plagues of locusts and frogs and water turning to blood, etc.  His own stubborn pride brought him and his unwitting subjects to ruin because he refused to obey the will of God.  Our own nation’s current downward trajectory is also now so obvious that it is hard to believe that the haughty and proud leaders of the secularist movement cannot see where their disobedience to God’s will is taking us.

Most Americans today have lost confidence in their government.  Indeed, for the first time in our nation’s history, it was reported earlier this month, by a Bloomberg National Poll, that a majority of us believe that our children’s generation will be worse off than our own.  This pessimism is well justified by our chronically anemic economy.  Even financial genius Bill Gross, CEO of PIMCO, reported this month that the declining dollar will lead to “a lower standard of living” in this country.  He concluded that: “A future of low investment returns, and a heap of trouble for those expecting more, is what lies ahead.”  Thus, we are reaping what we have sown.  We have to decide if we are going to once again follow the lead of enlightened men like Washington and Lincoln, or let the secularists and their judicial minions hijack the nation and lead it to ruin.

As I predicted just over a year ago, time is fast running out.  It has largely been on our watch, that is the baby boomer generation of which I am a part, that this disaster has happened.  I still believe that by the grace of God we can turn this around, but only if we genuinely seek His help.  And, we must vigorously resist the misguided and increasingly virulent efforts of those who would seek to have us reject the faith and morals that once made us a great nation.  For starters, the three recent judicial decisions, that make up the “trilogy of tyranny”, must be recognized for the miscarriage of justice and usurpation of power that they represent, and they must be soundly rejected.  If they are not, then our fate is sealed.

Note: My conclusions are based on the monumental study by Joseph Unwin, PhD., “Sexual Regulations and Cultural Behavior” synopsis here.  S. Michael Craven used the same study for his series, “In Defense of Marriage July 7,2008-August 18, 2008, archived here.

Mr. LiMandri orginally posted both articles on Catholic Exchange.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Federal Judge Seizes Control of Military, Imposes Worldwide Ban on “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”

October 13, 2010 by

imag461ANN ARBOR, MI – Federal District Judge Virginia A. Phillips has seized control of America’s armed forces worldwide by ordering the United States of America, the Secretary of Defense, and all military officers to stop enforcing the law prohibiting open homosexuals from serving in the military.  Judge Phillips, a Clinton-appointee, further ordered the immediate suspension of any investigation or discharge that may have been commenced under the law.

Judge Phillips’ order ignores Section 8 of our Constitution that gives the power to Congress “To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces.”  Her ruling also ignores the U. S. Supreme Court admonition that the judiciary is the least qualified branch of government to make policy for the military.

In fact, more 1,163 distinguished retired military leaders from all branches of the services including two former Chairmen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, several Service Chiefs and a number of combat commanders have signed an open letter that supports the law prohibiting homosexuals from serving in the military.  In a statement released last year, they expressed their alarm about the impact a repeal of the ban would have on “morale, discipline, unit cohesion, and overall readiness.”

The Thomas More Law Center, a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, has actively opposed militant homosexual advocacy groups which zealously and methodically seek to homosexualize the military regardless of the impact on national security.

Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of the Thomas More Law Center warned: “If Judge Phillips’ order is allowed to stand, it will ultimately result in the destruction of the most effective military force in the history of the world. We now have an all-volunteer military.  Studies show that up to 24 percent of our military would resign when their term is up should open homosexuals be allowed in the military.  Parents will discourage their young sons and daughters from enlisting in an organization that will ultimately be dominated by homosexuals and their agenda.”

Continued Thompson: “The primary purpose of our military is to win wars.  Our military should not be used as a laboratory for social experimentation.  We must not allow a political agenda to destroy our war- fighting capabilities. I believe Judge Phillip’s Order leaves the Justice Department no choice but to appeal her over-reaching and ridiculous order.”

According to Judge Phillips’s order:

Defendants United States of America and the Secretary of Defense [are ordered] immediately to suspend and discontinue any investigation, or discharge, separation, or other proceeding, that may have been commenced under the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” Act, or pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 654 or its implementing regulations, on or prior to the date of this Judgment.

Click here to read the judge’s order and injunction.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

First Lower Court Ruling on Substance of Obama Health Care Act

October 7, 2010 by

imag464Detroit Federal District Judge George Caram Steeh this afternoon ruled that the Thomas More Law Center and the four Michigan plaintiffs it represented had standing to challenge the Health Care Reform Act and that the challenge was ripe for review.  The Judge held, however, that Congress has the authority under its Commerce Clause power to enact the individual mandate provision of the Act, which requires individuals to purchase health care insurance under penalty of federal law. [Read  Order here]

Judge Steeh is the first judge to nationally rule on the key objection to the law.  The Thomas More Law Center, a national Christian public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor Michigan, sued on behalf of itself and four plaintiffs.  By ruling in favor of the plaintiffs on all the jurisdictional issues, the case is in a posture for review by federal appellate courts on the substantive issue of whether the health care law violates the Commerce Clause.

Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of the Law Center commented, “Obama Care is one of the most oppressive measures in the history of our Nation.  And it was passed by Congress despite overwhelming opposition of the American people.  It was not about reforming health care, but government seizure of unprecedented power over our lives.  It transfers control of one-sixth of our Nation’s economy to Washington bureaucrats, and it will add an estimated 16,000 to 20,000 additional IRS agents to monitor tax returns and records to determine compliance with the new regulations.  We will continue to challenge it in the courts.”

According to the Law Center, the court took the extraordinary step of concluding that Congress’ Commerce Clause power does not end at regulating economic activity.  Rather, this power can be extended to regulate economic decisions whether made consciously or not.  The court stated, “While plaintiffs describe the Commerce Clause power as reaching economic activity, the government’s characterization of the Commerce Clause reaching economic decisions is more accurate.”

Rob Muise, The Law Center’s senior trial counsel who handled the case commented, “This decision is ripe for appeal, which we intend to do expeditiously.”

The Thomas More Law Center defends and promotes America’s Christian heritage and moral values, including the religious freedom of Christians, time-honored family values, and the sanctity of human life.  It supports a strong national defense and an independent and sovereign United States of America.  The Law Center accomplishes its mission through litigation, education, and related activities. It does not charge for its services. The Law Center is supported by contributions from individuals, corporations and foundations, and is recognized by the IRS as a section 501(c)(3) organization.  You may reach the Thomas More Law Center at (734) 827-2001 or visit our website at www.thomasmore.org.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Stratechuk v. South Orange/Maplewood School District

October 4, 2010 by

Filed Under: Uncategorized

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 43
  • Page 44
  • Page 45
  • Page 46
  • Page 47
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 101
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

  • The President’s Blog
  • TMLC in the News
  • Request for Legal Help
  • Leave a Legacy
  • Sign up as Pro Bono Attorney

Get Email Updates

STAY CONNECTED
  • Become a Fan
  • Follow Us
  • Video Library
  • RSS Feed

  • Home
  • Key Issues
  • News
  • About
  • Contact
  • Donate
© 2024 - Thomas More Law Center • 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive • Suite J 3200 • Ann Arbor, MI 48106 • Office: 734.827.2001 • Fax: 734.930.7160